Factorio Forums

Here is some TODO on the wiki now with the new awesome update (I guess most ppl wont see this as they're busy playing with the new update )

https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/inde ... le=Enemies -> New enemies
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/inde ... Small_pump -> can now be controlled with logic
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/index.php?title=Lamp -> same as above
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/inde ... orage_tank -> same as above
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/inde ... combinator -> Add more information
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/index.php?title=Tank -> added new ammo (which needs an icon as well)
https://forums.factorio.com/wiki/inde ... Train_stop -> Missing information, also controlled with logic

This is a list of things I will do when I feel like it. Unless you guys *hint* beats me to it *hint* (It will probably be outdated by tomorrow).

This template's read page is a mess for me, anyone got a clue?

Also Cake!

The entire train&rail section should be restructured. Too many small articles for my taste.

Also the stop doesn't have a signal condition yet.

ratchetfreak wrote:The entire train&rail section should be restructured. Too many small articles for my taste.

Damn! I haven't got to trains just yet in my 0.12 play-through

ratchetfreak wrote:Also the stop doesn't have a signal condition yet.

I agree, it needs a cleanup! But couldn't find this one here.

ssilk wrote:

Invitation

You are now officially invited to change the wiki. Cause it is a wiki.

Thx! But im already on it! So why haven't I done any of these changes yet?

I'd like to start changing the lua pages. But i'm not sure exactly how to handle the fact that all commands have different names now. Remove all 0.11 commands or keep them somewhere? Once 0.12 is stable i guess nobody will ever care about 0.11 again, but right now it's kind of a transition phase.

I thought the changes are not so much. And for the that part of the wiki I see a responsibility and interest from the devs-side to have this as actual as possible, cause that avoids expensive support.

provet wrote:This template's read page[/url] is a mess for me, anyone got a clue?

Click on the view button to the left. It will make the page more readable


/ qwe85

tried to fixed machinery. recipe parameter messed up the page i think, as documentation was outdated?. not sure about the other parameters